4 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
User Gravatar
James said in November 12th, 2011 at 10:49 am

Shaun,

Thanks for the plug. You might want to change the link on your image to this permanent one: http://www.eisenbrauns.com/item/WALGENESIS

Also, we offer all Eisenbrauns titles at 10% off on our web site everyday, so the price is $31.05. Or, if you are going to ETS, ASOR, or AAR/SBL, the price is 30% off for cash and carry.

James

User Gravatar
Shaun Tabatt said in November 13th, 2011 at 8:17 am

James,

I updated the link and thanks for the tip on the discount.

User Gravatar
Michael Snow said in November 21st, 2011 at 8:46 pm

This sounds like an important contribution.
Once concern is this statement: “He contends that Genesis 1 never was an account of material origins but that, as in the rest of the ancient world, the focus of “creation texts” was to order the cosmos…”
I would like to know if he is taking Gen. 1:1 in the absolute sense, as in every ancient translation or is he taking the modern route of seeing it as a dependent clause, as in some translations: “When God began creating…” thus making God not the creator of the univese but,like the cosmology of the day, a god who brings order to the pre-existent chaos.

User Gravatar
Shaun Tabatt said in November 23rd, 2011 at 6:45 am

Michael,

That’s a good question. As I haven’t read Genesis 1 as Ancient Cosmology yet, I can’t specifically answer the question based on the merits of the text, but having read previous books by Walton, I believe he would contend that God is the creator of the universe. Hopefully somebody will bless me with the book this Christmas and then I can find out. 😉

Leave A Reply

 Name (Required)

 Email Address (Remains Private)

 Website (Optional)